Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Facebook

Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press, Via Associated Press
Updated: March 29, 2011
Facebook, the world's largest social network, announced in July 2010 that it had 500 million users around the world. The company has grown at a meteoric pace, doubling in size since 2009 and pushing international competitors aside. Its policies, more than those of any other company, are helping to define standards for privacy in the Internet age.
The company, founded in 2004 by a Harvard sophomore, Mark Zuckerberg, began life catering first to Harvard students and then to all high school and college students. It has since evolved into a broadly popular online destination used by both teenagers and adults of all ages. In country after country, Facebook is cementing itself as the leader and often displacing other social networks, much as it outflanked MySpace in the United States.
But it has also come to be seen as one of the new titans of the Internet, challenging even Google with a vision of a Web tied together through personal relationships and recommendations, rather than by search algorithms. In a major expansion, Facebook has spread itself across other Web sites by offering members the chance to "Like'' something — share it with their network — without leaving the Web page they're on.
In November 2010, Mr. Zuckerberg introduced Facebook Messages, a new unified messaging system that allows people to communicate with one another on the Web and on mobile phones regardless of whether they are using e-mail, text messages or online chat services.
The company raised $500 million from Goldman Sachs and a Russian investor in January 2011 in a deal that values the company at $50 billion — more than companies like eBay, Yahoo and Time Warner. The stake by Goldman Sachs, considered one of Wall Street’s savviest investors, signals the increasing might of Facebook, which has already been bearing down on giants like Google.
But in a surprise move, Goldman said in January that it was limiting its offer to foreign clients because of worries that the deal might run afoul of securities regulations. The decision was considered a serious embarrassment for the bank, which had marketed the investment to its wealthiest clients, including corporate magnates and directors of the nation’s largest companies.
While it has come under fire for a series of privacy stumbles, Facebook largely remains a darling of politicians. But the company has watched the missteps of Microsoft and Google in Washington, and knows that its current skirmishes are merely a prelude to looming clashes over its influence on the economic and social Web.
It is building a stalwart defense, moving at broadband speed from start-up to realpolitik strategist. One strategy has been to befriend Washington. Facebook has layered its executive, legal, policy and communications ranks with high-powered politicos from both parties, beefing up its firepower for future battles in Washington and beyond. In March 2011, the company was trying to lure Robert Gibbs, President Obama’s former White House press secretary, to its communications team.
Disputed Origins
The company's rise has been marked by strings of controversies. Three other Harvard students maintain that they came up with the original idea and that Mr. Zuckerberg, whom they had hired to write code for the site, stole the idea to create Facebook. Facebook has denied the allegations. A long-running lawsuit is pending. Another Harvard classmate, Aaron Greenspan, claims that he created the underlying architecture for both companies, but has declined to enter the legal battle.
A 2010 movie about Facebook’s tumultuous origins, "The Social Network," offered up what A.O. Scott called "a creation story for the digital age and something of a morality tale, one driven by desire, marked by triumph, tainted by betrayal and inspired by the new gospel: the geek shall inherit the earth."
Facebook has strenuously, and Mr. Zuckerberg more quietly, asserted that the portrayal of the company's founding is fiction. And Mr. Zuckerberg disputed the characterization of him in the film, though in a New Yorker magazine profile, he acknowledged having indulged in a bit of sophomoric arrogance.
Privacy Concerns
Like other social networks, Facebook allows its users to create a profile page and forge online links with friends and acquaintances. It has distinguished itself from rivals, partly by imposing a spartan design ethos and limiting how users can change the appearance of their profile pages. That has cut down on visual clutter and threats like spam, which plague rivals. It has decisively outstripped other networks that preceded it, like MySpace and Friendster, becoming what many analysts see as the "default platform'' of a new age of information organized around personal relationships.
The back and forth between Facebook and its users over privacy is gaining importance as the company's growth continues unabated. Facebook's policies, more than those of any other company, are helping to define standards for privacy in the Internet age.
Bowing to pressure over privacy concerns, the company in May 2010 unveiled a set of controls that he said would help people understand what they were sharing online, and with whom.
Facebook's biggest mistake, Mr. Zuckerman said, had been in failing to notice that as Facebook added new features and its privacy controls grew increasingly complicated, those controls became effectively unusable for many people.
In October 2010, Facebook acknowledged that some applications on its site, including the popular game FarmVille, had improperly shared identifying information about users, and in some cases their friends, with advertisers and Web tracking companies. The company said it was talking to application developers about how they handled personal information, and was looking at ways to prevent this from happening again.
The Goldman Deal
In January 2011, Facebook raised $500 million from Goldman Sachs and a Russian investor in a transaction that values the company at $50 billion. As part of the deal with Facebook, the bank could raise as much as $1.5 billion from investors for Facebook. The new money will give the company more firepower to steal away valuable employees, develop new products and possibly pursue acquisitions — all without being a publicly traded company. The investment may also allow earlier shareholders, including Facebook employees, to cash out at least some of their stakes.
The new investment came as the Securities and Exchange Commission has begun an inquiry into the increasingly hot private market for shares in Internet companies, including Facebook, Twitter, the gaming site Zynga and LinkedIn, an online professional networking site. Some experts suggest the inquiry is focused on whether certain companies are improperly using the private market to get around public disclosure requirements.
Also in January, catching many off guard, Goldman said that it would limit its Facebook offering to foreign investors, excluding clients in the United States because of worries that the deal could run afoul of securities.
The offering to high-net-worth clients was supposed to have been a triumph for the firm, not the serious embarrassment it became. Goldman has been trying to move past run-ins with regulators, including a $550 million settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2010 over a complex mortgage investment. The Facebook plan will likely raise new questions about whether Goldman tried to push regulatory boundaries once again.
Mr. Zuckerberg had sought to keep close control over the company, spurning a $1 billion offer from Yahoo in 2006 and playing down the idea of a stock offering. But in the wake of the Goldman investment, Facebook said that it will begin reporting its financial results by April 2012, setting the stage for a likely IPO.
The company, based in Palo Alto, Calif., earned $355 million on $1.2 billion in revenue during the first nine months of 2010, according to a document prepared by Goldman for potential investors. That is up from $220 million in earnings on $770 million in sales in 2009.

Source : http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/facebook_inc/index.html

Monday, May 9, 2011

Juicy New Mass Effect 3 Details + One Massive Spoiler

Mass-Effect-3-2
Some new juicy Mass Effect 3 details have been unearthed including one huge spoiler in the highly anticipated BioWare-developed game.
The Official Xbox Magazine contained the following new details for Mass Effect 3 including a huge spoiler so beware:
  • You can jump and roll, and blindfire has been introduced.
  • As well as gaining civilisation’s alliegance, you can lose them to the Reapers if you don’t play right, similarly to losing squadmates in the suicide mission.
  • Your weapons have three upgrade slots -scope barrel and grip, and you can change the colour and camoflage of weapons.
  • Cerberus and husks will be main enemies, and cerberus is divided into three main types of troops – heavy bruisers, medium and light.
  • You may be able to get an eyepiece, like Garrus’s, that will allow non-sniper weapons to scope in further, which also hints at armour having more of an effect on gameplay.
  • Bioware are going to announce something big at E3 – a lot of the gameplay features and more squadmates.
Spoiler:
  • The magazine suggests that Garrus is being built up to a dramatic death.

    Source : http://vgn365.com/2011/05/09/juicy-new-mass-effect-3-details-one-massive-spoiler/

    In Other News – May 9th, 2011

    In Other News   May 9th, 2011 Juliana Martins ION   Lazygamer
    As far as Monday’s go, this one wasn’t half bad. The weekend left us feeling all nostalgic, and today saw (for the first time in a while (okay, it was only a week)) the entire Lazygamer gang back together again. Hooah!
    Geoff had a great time getting back to his racing roots around the track, set some impressive lap times and came back with an awesome preview of the upcoming racer from Ubisoft, Driver: San Francisco. Gavin on the other hand came back with sand and a hangover. Jealous much?
    Here’s the news Nick and I didn’t post to give Geoff and Gavin some alone time with the site.

    HSBC disappoints as profits fall short

    HSBC revenues were down 5% at $24.5 billion, but chief executive says lending volumes have increased by $39 billion.
    HSBC revenues were down 5% at $24.5 billion, but chief executive says lending volumes have increased by $39 billion.
    STORY HIGHLIGHTS
    • 10% fall in underlying pre-tax profits in the three months to end of March to $5.5B
    • Bank reveals $400M impairment charge in U.S., $78M charge to fund US software problems
    RELATED TOPICS
    (FT) -- HSBC disappointed the markets on Monday with profits that fell short of expectations, as the bank reported a further hiccup in its troubled US consumer business.
    Stuart Gulliver, chief executive, said overall profits overall had "held up extremely well" with "reasonably strong numbers". An acceleration in restructuring in some of its troubled operations was largely responsible for a 10 per cent fall in underlying pre-tax profits in the three months to end-March to $5.5bn, he said
    But Mr Gulliver revealed a fresh $400m impairment charge in the US, as house prices there failed to recover as expected, and instead either stagnated or in some areas slipped further. There was also a $78m charge to fund US software problems.
    The numbers were the first for which Mr Gulliver was responsible, after taking over as chief executive at the start of the year. He is on Wednesday due to present details of a strategic review of HSBC's global operations, which is expected to involve an overhaul of its US business, with the sale of certain units.
    As part of the broader restructuring effort, the bank took a $68m charge relating to its Latin American operations in the first quarter.
    Analysts have been particularly concerned about rising costs across the group. Mr Gulliver said the cost-income ratio had jumped in the first quarter to 61 per cent, from 55 per cent at the end of last year, although without one-off charges the number was flat.
    Included in those one-offs was a $440m charge relating to mis-sold personal protection insurance, as Britain's banking sector opted not to appeal against a recent court ruling. The figure, which followed a £3.2bn charge taken by Lloyds last Thursday, was much lower than some analysts had expected but Mr Gulliver said the provision was a "reasonable stab" at what the affair would cost it.
    "We stopped writing this stuff at the beginning of 2007," he said, while some competitors had continued selling PPI policies until last year.
    Mr Gulliver said lending volumes had increased by $39bn, with much of that growth directed at Asia. However, he played down concerns about a credit bubble in Hong Kong and China. "Nothing gives me cause for concern that we're writing business into a bubble," he said.
    Revenues were down 5 per cent at €17bn, but loan impairments plunged by 37 per cent to $2.4bn, the lowest since early 2006. Mr Gulliver was particularly pleased with growth in the equities unit of the investment bank, although overall investment banking revenues were down. Mr Gulliver was the former head of the investment bank.
    Headline pre-tax profits for the quarter, which included the impact of revaluing the bank's own debt, were $4.9bn, down 14 per cent.
    Mr Gulliver warned that it would be two or three years before the bank's cost-income ratio would reach the targeted 48-52 per cent range, and return on equity would rise to his goal of 12-15 per cent. He said he hoped this year's ROE would be better than last year's 9.5 per cent. In the first quarter of the year, the low effective tax rate inflated the number to 11.4 per cent.
    HSBC's tax rate for the quarter fell to an exceptionally low 10 per cent, compared with a normal annual level of 19-22 per cent, thanks to one-off tax credits in the US. The bank took a $600m charge towards the UK balance sheet levy. HSBC has long been peeved that the tax applies to its global business, not just UK operations, and Mr Gulliver said two-thirds of the charge related to non-UK business.
    The bank is due this year to conduct a scheduled triennial review of its domicile. But Mr Gulliver said that would not take place until the fourth quarter of the year, by which time the final report from the Independent Commission on Banking, appointed by the UK government, should be published. The ICB has recommended that banks' UK retail banking operations should be ringfenced to protect British taxpayers.
    Shares in HSBC fell 1.5 per cent in early London trading to 642p.

    Source : http://edition.cnn.com

    Apple is world's most valuable brand

    Apple CEO Steve Jobs with the iPhone, which has helped propel the company past Google as the world's most valuable brand.
    Apple CEO Steve Jobs with the iPhone, which has helped propel the company past Google as the world's most valuable brand.
    STORY HIGHLIGHTS
    • Apple has overtaken Google to become the world's most valuable brand
    • Apple now valued at $153bn, according to new rankings published on Monday
    RELATED TOPICS
    (FT) -- Apple has overtaken Google to become the world's most valuable brand with an estimated brand value of more than $153bn, according to new rankings published on Monday.
    For the last four years, Google has dominated the BrandZ Top100 ranking of the most valuable global brands, compiled by Millward Brown, a subsidiary of advertising company WPP. The ranking covers everything from cars to clothing and banks to telecoms providers.
    Thanks to the success of the iPad tablet and iPhone mobile -- among both consumers and corporations -- Apple's brand value has surged in the last year to overtake that of the search engine company.
    Apple has increased its brand value by $137bn, or 859 per cent, since 2006 when the BrandZ rankings were launched. The brand valuation compares with Apple's stock market capitalisation of $319.4bn, which is almost five times higher than in 2006. Google's market capitalisation is $172.4bn.
    The BrandZ index calculates brand value on a number of factors, including an estimate of the brand's contribution to earnings, valuation of intangible assets, measures of customer perception and an estimate of growth potential.
    Peter Walshe, global BrandZ director at Millward Brown, said Apple's success reflected the fact that its products were not only highly desired by consumers but also seen by companies as useful.
    "The anecdotal evidence is that if employees are given the choice of two similar jobs they opt for the one with better technology for its employees -- for example an iPad," Mr Walshe said. Apple, he added, had also succeeded in emulating luxury goods brands, in that making its products more expensive had increased their desirability.
    The brand rankings are dominated by technology companies, with six out of the top 10 places occupied by Apple, Google, IBM, Microsoft, AT&T and China Mobile.

    Source : http://edition.cnn.com
    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...